What are the chances of seeing a Transparent 6-Line Blue in Taroko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Transparent 6-Line Blue sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Transparent 6-Line Blue in Taroko National Park?
July and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Transparent 6-Line Blue in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, June and August–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Transparent 6-Line Blue?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Transparent 6-Line Blue sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Taroko National Park the best place to see a Transparent 6-Line Blue?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Transparent 6-Line Blue sightings, Taroko National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Transparent 6-Line Blue live in Taroko National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Transparent 6-Line Blue that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Burmese Bushblue (about 20%), Common Line Blue (about 20%) and Celastrina oreas (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Transparent 6-Line Blue sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Transparent 6-Line Blue is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.