What are the chances of seeing a Rose-faced Parrot in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rose-faced Parrot sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rose-faced Parrot in Utría National Natural Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rose-faced Parrot in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, March, July and September–November, the lowest months. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rose-faced Parrot?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rose-faced Parrot sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Rose-faced Parrot?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Rose-faced Parrot sightings, Utría National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rose-faced Parrot live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same family: Psittacidae
The closest relatives of the Rose-faced Parrot that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (family Psittacidae, New World and African Parrots) are Blue-headed Parrot (about 30%), Red-lored Parrot (about 20%) and Mealy Parrot (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rose-faced Parrot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rose-faced Parrot is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.