Aricia artaxerxes
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
The northern brown argus (Aricia artaxerxes) is a butterfly in the family Lycaenidae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vanoise National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 2 | Mercantour National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Cairngorms National Park | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 4 | Triglav National Park | 🇸🇮 Slovenia | |
| 5 | Ecrins National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moscow | 🇷🇺 Russia |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Brown Argus sighting in Vanoise National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 51st most-seen of the 308 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Brown Argus in Vanoise National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Brown Argus sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Northern Brown Argus sightings, Vanoise National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Mercantour National Park (France, about 20%) and Cairngorms National Park (United Kingdom, about 10%).
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Northern Brown Argus that you can see in Vanoise National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Scarce Copper (about 40%), Damon Blue (about 40%) and Chalkhill Blue (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Brown Argus is recorded against all the insects logged in Vanoise National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
