What are the chances of seeing a Magellanic Woodpecker in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Magellanic Woodpecker sighting in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, based on 99 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 70 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Magellanic Woodpecker in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park?
March, May and September–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Magellanic Woodpecker in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Magellanic Woodpecker?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Magellanic Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park the best place to see a Magellanic Woodpecker?
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Magellanic Woodpecker sightings, Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Tierra del Fuego National Park (Argentina, about 50%).
Which relatives of the Magellanic Woodpecker live in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Magellanic Woodpecker that you can see in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Chilean Flicker (about 30%) and Striped Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Magellanic Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Magellanic Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park (99 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.