Philipomyia aprica
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
Philipomyia aprica is a species of horse fly of the family Tabanidae, subfamily Tabaninae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aigüestortes National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 2 | Vanoise National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Mercantour National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 4 | Triglav National Park | 🇸🇮 Slovenia | |
| 5 | Ecrins National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 6 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Philipomyia aprica sighting in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 79th most-seen of the 256 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Philipomyia aprica in Aigüestortes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–June and September–November, the lowest months.
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Philipomyia aprica sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Philipomyia aprica sightings, Aigüestortes National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Vanoise National Park (France, about 20%) and Mercantour National Park (France, about 10%).
Same order: Diptera
The closest relatives of the Philipomyia aprica that you can see in Aigüestortes National Park (order Diptera, Flies) are Pellucid Hover Fly (about 30%), Common Drone Fly (about 20%) and Tapered Drone Fly (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Philipomyia aprica is recorded against all the insects logged in Aigüestortes National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
