Leuciris fimbriaria
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | |
| 2 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Leuciris fimbriaria sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May–July and November–February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Leuciris fimbriaria in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and August–October, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Leuciris fimbriaria sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Leuciris fimbriaria sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 20%), Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Leuciris fimbriaria that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Hübner's Olive (about 10%) and Paragonia cruraria (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Leuciris fimbriaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
