What are the chances of seeing a Zavaleta Glasswing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Zavaleta Glasswing sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 38th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Zavaleta Glasswing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
July–September and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Zavaleta Glasswing in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Zavaleta Glasswing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Zavaleta Glasswing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Zavaleta Glasswing?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Zavaleta Glasswing sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Zavaleta Glasswing live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Zavaleta Glasswing that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Banded Owl-Butterfly (about 20%) and Julia Heliconian (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Zavaleta Glasswing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Zavaleta Glasswing is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.