What are the chances of seeing a Banded Tigerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Banded Tigerwing sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 33 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 27th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Banded Tigerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
January, April and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Banded Tigerwing in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Banded Tigerwing?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Banded Tigerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Banded Tigerwing?
3rd of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Banded Tigerwing sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Cahuita National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Banded Tigerwing live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Banded Tigerwing that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Banded Owl-Butterfly (about 20%) and Julia Heliconian (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Banded Tigerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Banded Tigerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (33 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.