Aeolochroma hypochromaria
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Aeolochroma hypochromaria is a moth of the family Geometridae first described by Achille Guenée in 1858. It is found in Australia (New South Wales and Queensland) and New Caledonia. Adults have a complex brown and dark green pattern. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Aeolochroma hypochromaria sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 122nd most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September to June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Aeolochroma hypochromaria in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and August, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Aeolochroma hypochromaria sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Blue Mountains National Park, in our data
Blue Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Aeolochroma hypochromaria sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Aeolochroma
The closest relatives of the Aeolochroma hypochromaria that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (genus Aeolochroma) are Tea-Tree Emerald (about 10%) and Aeolochroma mniaria (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Aeolochroma hypochromaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
