What are the chances of seeing a Short-Tailed Line-Blue in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Short-Tailed Line-Blue sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 681st most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-Tailed Line-Blue in Blue Mountains National Park?
February–March and May–July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Short-Tailed Line-Blue in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and August–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Short-Tailed Line-Blue?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-Tailed Line-Blue sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Short-Tailed Line-Blue?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Short-Tailed Line-Blue sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Short-Tailed Line-Blue live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Short-Tailed Line-Blue that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Lesser Grass Blue (about 20%), Zizina labradus (about 10%) and Common Imperial Blue (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-Tailed Line-Blue sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-Tailed Line-Blue is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.