What are the chances of seeing a Swordgrass Brown in Blue Mountains National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Swordgrass Brown sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 399 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swordgrass Brown in Blue Mountains National Park?
February and November–December
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Swordgrass Brown in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Swordgrass Brown?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swordgrass Brown sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Swordgrass Brown?
Among the best
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Swordgrass Brown sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Booderee National Park (Australia, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Swordgrass Brown live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Swordgrass Brown that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Common Brown (about 30%), Australian Painted Lady (about 30%) and Yellow Admiral (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swordgrass Brown sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swordgrass Brown is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (399 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.