What are the chances of seeing a Euglyphis braganza in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis braganza sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 325th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Euglyphis braganza in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
April, June, September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis braganza in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July–August, October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Euglyphis braganza?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Euglyphis braganza sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Euglyphis braganza?
Only Braulio Carrillo National Park, in our data
Braulio Carrillo National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Euglyphis braganza sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Euglyphis braganza live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same genus: Euglyphis
The closest relatives of the Euglyphis braganza that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Euglyphis) are Euglyphis rundala (about 10%), Euglyphis barda (about 10%) and Euglyphis asapha (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Euglyphis braganza sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Euglyphis braganza is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.