Euglyphis asapha
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenorio Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Corcovado National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis asapha sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 325th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April, June and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euglyphis asapha in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May and July–November, the lowest months.
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Euglyphis asapha sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Euglyphis asapha sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%), Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same genus: Euglyphis
The closest relatives of the Euglyphis asapha that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Euglyphis) are Euglyphis rundala (about 10%), Euglyphis barda (about 10%) and Euglyphis braganza (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Euglyphis asapha is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
