Omiodes croceiceps
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Omiodes croceiceps is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1866. It is found in Brazil (Para, Amazonas, Ega), Peru, Panama and Costa Rica. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | |
| 2 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes croceiceps sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 290th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes croceiceps in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–March, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Omiodes croceiceps sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Omiodes croceiceps sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 10%).
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Omiodes croceiceps that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Conchylodes nolckenialis (about 20%), Asturodes fimbriauralis (about 10%) and Desmia bajulalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Omiodes croceiceps is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
