What are the chances of seeing a Desmia bajulalis in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Desmia bajulalis sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 122nd most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Desmia bajulalis in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
February and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Desmia bajulalis in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Desmia bajulalis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Desmia bajulalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Desmia bajulalis?
4th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Desmia bajulalis sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 20%), Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 10%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Desmia bajulalis live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Desmia bajulalis that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Conchylodes nolckenialis (about 20%), Asturodes fimbriauralis (about 10%) and Orange-Spotted Flower Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Desmia bajulalis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Desmia bajulalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.