What are the chances of seeing a Paragonia cruraria in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Paragonia cruraria sighting in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 74 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paragonia cruraria in Brownsberg Nature Park?
January
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Paragonia cruraria in Brownsberg Nature Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, May, July–August and October, the lowest months. September has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Paragonia cruraria?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paragonia cruraria sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Brownsberg Nature Park the best place to see a Paragonia cruraria?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Paragonia cruraria sightings, Brownsberg Nature Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Paragonia cruraria live in Brownsberg Nature Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Paragonia cruraria that you can see in Brownsberg Nature Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Synchlora gerularia (about 50%), Idaea speciosa (about 40%) and Idaea fervens (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paragonia cruraria sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paragonia cruraria is recorded against all the insects logged in Brownsberg Nature Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.