Agrosoma placetis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve | 🇲🇽 Mexico | |
| 2 | Biotopo Cerro Cahuí | 🇬🇹 Guatemala |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guatemala City | 🇬🇹 Guatemala | |
| 2 | San José | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Medellín | 🇨🇴 Colombia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agrosoma placetis sighting in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 77 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Agrosoma placetis in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and July–December, the lowest months. That is one of Biotopo Cerro Cahuí's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain against 25 mm in March.
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agrosoma placetis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Agrosoma placetis sightings, Biotopo Cerro Cahuí ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%).
Same family: Cicadellidae
The closest relatives of the Agrosoma placetis that you can see in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (family Cicadellidae, Typical Leafhoppers) are Erythrogonia areolata (about 30%), Pawiloma jucunda (about 30%) and Erythrogonia laudata (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Agrosoma placetis is recorded against all the insects logged in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
