What are the chances of seeing a Black-crowned Antpitta in Chagres National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-crowned Antpitta sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 322nd most-seen of the 372 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-crowned Antpitta in Chagres National Park?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-crowned Antpitta in Chagres National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months. That is one of Chagres National Park's wettest months, with about 270 mm of rain against 30 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Black-crowned Antpitta?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-crowned Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see a Black-crowned Antpitta?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Black-crowned Antpitta sightings, Chagres National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-crowned Antpitta live in Chagres National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-crowned Antpitta that you can see in Chagres National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Crimson-backed Tanager (about 70%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%) and Golden-hooded Tanager (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-crowned Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-crowned Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Chagres National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.