What are the chances of seeing an Ithomia diasia in Chagres National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Ithomia diasia sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 25 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ithomia diasia in Chagres National Park?
February
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report an Ithomia diasia in Chagres National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to December, the lowest months. That is one of Chagres National Park's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 300 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see an Ithomia diasia?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ithomia diasia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see an Ithomia diasia?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Ithomia diasia sightings, Chagres National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Ithomia diasia live in Chagres National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Ithomia diasia that you can see in Chagres National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 50%), Confusa Tigerwing (about 40%) and White Peacock (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ithomia diasia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ithomia diasia is recorded against all the insects logged in Chagres National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.