What are the chances of seeing a Bagodares prosa in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bagodares prosa sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 127 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bagodares prosa in Chirripó National Park?
February and July
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bagodares prosa in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and August–January, the lowest months. Those are among Chirripó National Park's driest months, with about 170 mm of rain a month against 690 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Bagodares prosa?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bagodares prosa sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Bagodares prosa?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Bagodares prosa sightings, Chirripó National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Bagodares prosa live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Bagodares prosa that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Phrygionis polita (about 20%), Synnomos firmamentaria (about 20%) and Oxydia trychiata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bagodares prosa sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bagodares prosa is recorded against all the insects logged in Chirripó National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.