What are the chances of seeing a Nebulosa erymas in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nebulosa erymas sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 64th most-seen of the 127 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Nebulosa erymas in Chirripó National Park?
January–February and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Nebulosa erymas in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–July and September–December, the lowest months. Those are among Chirripó National Park's driest months, with about 180 mm of rain a month against 690 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Nebulosa erymas?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nebulosa erymas sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Nebulosa erymas?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Nebulosa erymas sightings, Chirripó National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come La Amistad International Park (Panama) (Panama, under 5%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Nebulosa erymas live in Chirripó National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Nebulosa erymas that you can see in Chirripó National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Drucina leonata (about 30%), Pansy Daggerwing (about 30%) and Widespread Eighty-Eight (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Nebulosa erymas sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nebulosa erymas is recorded against all the insects logged in Chirripó National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.