Tegosa claudina
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosario | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 3 | Porto Alegre | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 5 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | Belo Horizonte | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Claudina Crescent sighting in Belo Horizonte on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 74th most-seen of the 186 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March–April, August and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Claudina Crescent in Belo Horizonte on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–July, September–October and December, the lowest months.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Claudina Crescent sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
6th of 6
Of the 6 cities where we can rate Claudina Crescent sightings, Belo Horizonte ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Rosario (Argentina, about 20%), Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 20%) and Porto Alegre (Brazil, about 10%).
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Claudina Crescent that you can see in Belo Horizonte (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Starry Night Cracker (about 20%), White Peacock (about 20%) and Themisto Amberwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Claudina Crescent is recorded against all the insects logged in Belo Horizonte (12 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
