Stilpnochlora azteca
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca | 🇲🇽 Mexico | |
| 2 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Puebla | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 2 | Guatemala City | 🇬🇹 Guatemala | |
| 3 | Guadalajara | 🇲🇽 México | |
| 4 | San José | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 5 | Monterrey | 🇲🇽 México |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Stilpnochlora azteca sighting in Guatemala City on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 28th most-seen of the 87 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Stilpnochlora azteca in Guatemala City on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, June–July and October, the lowest months. Those are among Guatemala City's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain a month against 240 mm in September.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stilpnochlora azteca sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
2nd of 5
Of the 5 cities where we can rate Stilpnochlora azteca sightings, Guatemala City ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Puebla (México, about 20%).
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Stilpnochlora azteca that you can see in Guatemala City (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Giant Red-Winged Grasshopper (about 10%) and Prosphena scudderi (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stilpnochlora azteca is recorded against all the insects logged in Guatemala City (11 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
