Fascellina plagiata

Fascellina plagiata

Fascellina plagiata

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Hong Kong

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

64 Verified sightings at Hong Kong
5 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
April Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Khao Yai National Park 🇹🇭 Thailand
~10%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Hong Kong 🇨🇳 China
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Fascellina plagiata in Hong Kong?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fascellina plagiata sighting in Hong Kong on a given day, based on 64 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 189th most-seen of the 1125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Fascellina plagiata in Hong Kong?

March–April and June–October

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fascellina plagiata in Hong Kong on a given day, against under 5% in May and November–February, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Fascellina plagiata?

Between 5 and 8 am

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fascellina plagiata sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Where else can you see a Fascellina plagiata?

Only Hong Kong, in our data

Hong Kong is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Fascellina plagiata sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Where does the Fascellina plagiata sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Fascellina plagiata is recorded against all the insects logged in Hong Kong (64 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Hong Kong