Diplazon laetatorius
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Diplazon laetatorius is a hover fly parasitoid wasp in the Diplazontinae subfamily of the Ichneumonid wasp family (Ichneumonidae). It was first described as Ichneumon laetatorius in 1781 by Johan Christian Fabricius. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kuwait City | 🇰🇼 Kuwait | |
| 2 | Perth | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Auckland | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | |
| 4 | Phoenix | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 5 | Baltimore | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 6 | Sacramento | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 7 | London | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 8 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 9 | Sydney | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 10 | Boston | 🇺🇸 United States |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Hover Fly Parasitoid Wasp sighting in Melbourne on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 496th most-seen of the 875 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Hover Fly Parasitoid Wasp in Melbourne on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
8th of 18
Of the 18 cities where we can rate Common Hover Fly Parasitoid Wasp sightings, Melbourne ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kuwait City (Kuwait, about 10%), Perth (Australia, under 5%) and Auckland (New Zealand, under 5%).
Same family: Ichneumonidae
The closest relatives of the Common Hover Fly Parasitoid Wasp that you can see in Melbourne (family Ichneumonidae, Ichneumonid Wasps) are Orchid Dupe Wasp (about 10%) and Cream-Spotted Ichneumon (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Hover Fly Parasitoid Wasp is recorded against all the insects logged in Melbourne (16 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
