False Meadow Katydid

False Meadow Katydid

Conocephalomima barameda

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Melbourne

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

135 Verified sightings at Melbourne
5 In 1 park From 2019 to 2026
December Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Blue Mountains National Park 🇦🇺 Australia
<5%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Melbourne 🇦🇺 Australia
~10%
2 Sydney 🇦🇺 Australia
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a False Meadow Katydid in Melbourne?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a False Meadow Katydid sighting in Melbourne on a given day, based on 135 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 107th most-seen of the 875 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a False Meadow Katydid in Melbourne?

September to February

In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a False Meadow Katydid in Melbourne on a given day, against under 5% in March to August, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a False Meadow Katydid?

Between 10 am and 1 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most False Meadow Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Melbourne the best place to see a False Meadow Katydid?

Yes

Of the 2 cities where we can rate False Meadow Katydid sightings, Melbourne has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Sydney (Australia, under 5%).

Where does the False Meadow Katydid sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the False Meadow Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Melbourne (135 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Melbourne