Sarconesia magellanica

Sarconesia magellanica

Sarconesia magellanica

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Quito

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%

11 Verified sightings at Quito
March Best month

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Quito 🇪🇨 Ecuador
~10%
2 Santiago 🇨🇱 Chile
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Sarconesia magellanica in Quito?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sarconesia magellanica sighting in Quito on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 47th most-seen of the 83 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Sarconesia magellanica in Quito?

March

In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Sarconesia magellanica in Quito on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and July, the lowest months. That is one of Quito's wettest months, with about 180 mm of rain against 25 mm in August.

Is Quito the best place to see a Sarconesia magellanica?

Yes

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Sarconesia magellanica sightings, Quito has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Santiago (Chile, about 10%).

Which relatives of the Sarconesia magellanica live in Quito?

Same order: Diptera

The closest relatives of the Sarconesia magellanica that you can see in Quito (order Diptera, Flies) are Common Drone Fly (about 30%), Stripe-Eyed Lagoon Fly (about 30%) and Stable Fly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Sarconesia magellanica sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Sarconesia magellanica is recorded against all the insects logged in Quito (11 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Quito