Silhouette: Michael Day · PhyloPic
Rhagio tringaria
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Bear Rainforest | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 2 | Acadia National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Cairngorms National Park | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 4 | Bavarian Forest National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 5 | Wadden Sea National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Helsinki | 🇫🇮 Finland | |
| 2 | Rotterdam [The Hague] | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | |
| 3 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 4 | Liverpool | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 5 | Leeds | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 6 | Birmingham | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 7 | Saint Petersburg | 🇷🇺 Russia | |
| 8 | Seattle | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 9 | Kyiv | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | |
| 10 | Toronto | 🇨🇦 Canada |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhagio tringaria sighting in Rotterdam [The Hague] on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 213th most-seen of the 355 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June to August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhagio tringaria in Rotterdam [The Hague] on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months.
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhagio tringaria sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 17 cities where we can rate Rhagio tringaria sightings, Rotterdam [The Hague] ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Helsinki (Finland, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhagio tringaria is recorded against all the insects logged in Rotterdam [The Hague] (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
