What are the chances of seeing an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper in San Pedro Sula?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper sighting in San Pedro Sula on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 9th most-seen of the 79 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper in San Pedro Sula?
August and October
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper in San Pedro Sula on a given day, against under 5% in January to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is San Pedro Sula the best place to see an Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper?
Yes
Of the 8 cities where we can rate Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper sightings, San Pedro Sula has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Austin (United States, about 10%) and San José (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper live in San Pedro Sula?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper that you can see in San Pedro Sula (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Abracris flavolineata (about 40%), Silvitettix biolleyi (about 30%) and Orphulella punctata (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Aztec Spur-Throated Grasshopper is recorded against all the insects logged in San Pedro Sula (27 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.