Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at São Paulo

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

9 Verified sightings at São Paulo
February Best month

About the Eudocima procus

Eudocima procus is a moth of the family Erebidae described by Pieter Cramer in 1777. Wikipedia →

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability

More parks will be added in future updates.

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Quito 🇪🇨 Ecuador
~10%
2 Bogota 🇨🇴 Colombia
~10%
3 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Eudocima procus in São Paulo?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Eudocima procus sighting in São Paulo on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 537th most-seen of the 832 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Eudocima procus in São Paulo?

Any time of year

In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Eudocima procus in São Paulo on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.

Is São Paulo the best place to see a Eudocima procus?

3rd of 3

Of the 3 cities where we can rate Eudocima procus sightings, São Paulo ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Quito (Ecuador, about 10%) and Bogota (Colombia, about 10%).

Which relatives of the Eudocima procus live in São Paulo?

Same family: Erebidae

The closest relatives of the Eudocima procus that you can see in São Paulo (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Apistosia judas (about 10%), Black Witch (about 10%) and Argyroeides ophion (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.

Where does the Eudocima procus sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Eudocima procus is recorded against all the insects logged in São Paulo (9 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to São Paulo