Selatosomus suckleyi

Selatosomus suckleyi

Selatosomus suckleyi

Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Vancouver

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

12 Verified sightings at Vancouver
13 In all 2 parks From 2019 to 2026
May Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Great Bear Rainforest 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
2 Olympic National Park 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Vancouver 🇨🇦 Canada
<5%
2 Seattle 🇺🇸 United States
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Selatosomus suckleyi in Vancouver?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Selatosomus suckleyi sighting in Vancouver on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 278th most-seen of the 482 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Selatosomus suckleyi in Vancouver?

May

In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Selatosomus suckleyi in Vancouver on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months. That is one of Vancouver's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 210 mm in November.

What time of day is best to see a Selatosomus suckleyi?

Between noon and 3 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Selatosomus suckleyi sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Vancouver the best place to see a Selatosomus suckleyi?

Yes

Of the 2 cities where we can rate Selatosomus suckleyi sightings, Vancouver has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Seattle (United States, under 5%).

Where does the Selatosomus suckleyi sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Selatosomus suckleyi is recorded against all the insects logged in Vancouver (12 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Vancouver