What are the chances of seeing a Phlaeoba antennata in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Phlaeoba antennata sighting in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 126 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Phlaeoba antennata in Cuc Phuong National Park?
September
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Phlaeoba antennata in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August, October and December–April, the lowest months. That is one of Cuc Phuong National Park's wettest months, with about 330 mm of rain against 40 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Phlaeoba antennata?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Phlaeoba antennata sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuc Phuong National Park the best place to see a Phlaeoba antennata?
Among the best
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Phlaeoba antennata sightings, Cuc Phuong National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Phlaeoba antennata live in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Phlaeoba antennata that you can see in Cuc Phuong National Park (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Large Green Grasshopper (about 30%) and Short-Winged Rice Grasshopper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Phlaeoba antennata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Phlaeoba antennata is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuc Phuong National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.