Rhopalophora cupricollis
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Rhopalophora cupricollis is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Félix Édouard Guérin-Méneville in 1844. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cumbres de Monterrey National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rhopalophora cupricollis sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 344th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rhopalophora cupricollis in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months. That is one of Cumbres de Monterrey National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain against 20 mm in December.
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhopalophora cupricollis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Only Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, in our data
Cumbres de Monterrey National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Rhopalophora cupricollis sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Rhopalophora cupricollis that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Coastal Huisache Girdler (about 10%) and Ochraethes pollinosus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhopalophora cupricollis is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
