What are the chances of seeing a Fig Tree Borer in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Fig Tree Borer sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 390th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fig Tree Borer in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
June, August and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fig Tree Borer in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, July and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fig Tree Borer?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fig Tree Borer sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Fig Tree Borer?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Fig Tree Borer sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Ostional Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fig Tree Borer live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Fig Tree Borer that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Coastal Huisache Girdler (about 10%) and Ochraethes pollinosus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fig Tree Borer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fig Tree Borer is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.