Tylozygus geometricus
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Tylozygus geometricus is a species of sharpshooter in the family Cicadellidae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Smoky Mountains National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Big Cypress National Preserve | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Shenandoah National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Cumbres de Monterrey National Park | 🇲🇽 Mexico |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Baltimore | 🇺🇸 United States |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Tylozygus geometricus sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 304th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February, July, September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tylozygus geometricus in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–June, August, October and December–January, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tylozygus geometricus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Tylozygus geometricus sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (United States, about 10%), Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 10%) and Shenandoah National Park (United States, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tylozygus geometricus is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
