What are the chances of seeing an Acronicta psorallina in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Acronicta psorallina sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 173rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Acronicta psorallina in Daintree National Park?
February–April and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Acronicta psorallina in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Acronicta psorallina?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Acronicta psorallina sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see an Acronicta psorallina?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Acronicta psorallina sightings, Daintree National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Acronicta psorallina live in Daintree National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Acronicta psorallina that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are The Sorcerer (about 10%), Maliattha signifera (about 10%) and Oriental Leafworm Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Acronicta psorallina sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Acronicta psorallina is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.