Heterallactis stenochrysa
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
Heterallactis stenochrysa is a moth of the family Erebidae. It was described by Alfred Jefferis Turner in 1940. It is found in Queensland, Australia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heterallactis stenochrysa sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 173rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Heterallactis stenochrysa in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and December, the lowest months. That is one of Daintree National Park's wettest months, with about 380 mm of rain against 50 mm in September.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Heterallactis stenochrysa sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Heterallactis stenochrysa sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Heterallactis
The closest relatives of the Heterallactis stenochrysa that you can see in Daintree National Park (genus Heterallactis) are Heterallactis phlogozona (about 10%) and Heterallactis euchrysa (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Heterallactis stenochrysa is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
