What are the chances of seeing a Hyalobathra crenulata in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hyalobathra crenulata sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 254th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hyalobathra crenulata in Daintree National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Hyalobathra crenulata in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Hyalobathra crenulata?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hyalobathra crenulata sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Daintree National Park the best place to see a Hyalobathra crenulata?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Hyalobathra crenulata sightings, Daintree National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Hyalobathra crenulata live in Daintree National Park?
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Hyalobathra crenulata that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Tetrernia teminitis (about 20%), Bean Leafroller (about 20%) and Banded Pearl (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hyalobathra crenulata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hyalobathra crenulata is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.