What are the chances of seeing a Micrerethista fasciola in Daintree National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Micrerethista fasciola sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 653rd most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Micrerethista fasciola in Daintree National Park?
February and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Micrerethista fasciola in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–July, September–October and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Micrerethista fasciola?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Micrerethista fasciola sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Micrerethista fasciola?
Only Daintree National Park, in our data
Daintree National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Micrerethista fasciola sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Micrerethista fasciola live in Daintree National Park?
Same family: Tineidae
The closest relatives of the Micrerethista fasciola that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Tineidae, Fungus Moths, Clothes Moths, & Allies) are Moerarchis placomorpha (about 10%), Edosa xystidophora (about 10%) and Opogona glycyphaga (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Micrerethista fasciola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Micrerethista fasciola is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.