Edosa xystidophora
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Edosa xystidophora is a species of moth of the family Tineidae. It is found in Australia in Queensland and New South Wales. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Edosa xystidophora sighting in Daintree National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 339th most-seen of the 856 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Edosa xystidophora in Daintree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and September–December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Edosa xystidophora sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Edosa xystidophora sightings, Daintree National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Tineidae
The closest relatives of the Edosa xystidophora that you can see in Daintree National Park (family Tineidae, Fungus Moths, Clothes Moths, & Allies) are Moerarchis placomorpha (about 10%), Opogona glycyphaga (about 10%) and Micrerethista fasciola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Edosa xystidophora is recorded against all the insects logged in Daintree National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
