What are the chances of seeing a Common Tree Nymph in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tree Nymph sighting in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 102 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Tree Nymph in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
February and April
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common Tree Nymph in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, against under 5% in March, July and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Tree Nymph?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Tree Nymph sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Danum Valley Conservation Area the best place to see a Common Tree Nymph?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Common Tree Nymph sightings, Danum Valley Conservation Area ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Tree Nymph live in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Common Tree Nymph that you can see in Danum Valley Conservation Area (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Clipper (about 50%), Striped Ringlet (about 30%) and Malay Yeoman (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Tree Nymph sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Tree Nymph is recorded against all the insects logged in Danum Valley Conservation Area (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.