Seneca Ruby-Eye

Seneca Ruby-Eye

Perichares seneca

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Iguaçu National Park

In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%

8 Verified sightings at Iguaçu National Park From 2019 to 2026
22 In all 2 parks
June Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
2 Iguaçu National Park 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Seneca Ruby-Eye in Iguaçu National Park?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Seneca Ruby-Eye sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 195th most-seen of the 279 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Seneca Ruby-Eye in Iguaçu National Park?

June

In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Seneca Ruby-Eye in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and August–January, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see a Seneca Ruby-Eye?

Between noon and 3 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Seneca Ruby-Eye sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Iguaçu National Park the best place to see a Seneca Ruby-Eye?

Among the best

Of the 2 parks where we can rate Seneca Ruby-Eye sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).

Where does the Seneca Ruby-Eye sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Seneca Ruby-Eye is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguaçu National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Iguaçu National Park