What are the chances of seeing a Philipomyia aprica in Ecrins National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Philipomyia aprica sighting in Ecrins National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 168th most-seen of the 251 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Philipomyia aprica in Ecrins National Park?
July and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Philipomyia aprica in Ecrins National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months. Those are among Ecrins National Park's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain a month against 160 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Philipomyia aprica?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Philipomyia aprica sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ecrins National Park the best place to see a Philipomyia aprica?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Philipomyia aprica sightings, Ecrins National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%), Vanoise National Park (France, about 20%) and Mercantour National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Philipomyia aprica live in Ecrins National Park?
Same order: Diptera
The closest relatives of the Philipomyia aprica that you can see in Ecrins National Park (order Diptera, Flies) are Pellucid Hover Fly (about 10%), Common Drone Fly (about 10%) and Lesser Hornet Hoverfly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Philipomyia aprica sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Philipomyia aprica is recorded against all the insects logged in Ecrins National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.