What are the chances of seeing a Limenitis thessalia in El Palmar National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Limenitis thessalia sighting in El Palmar National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 35 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Limenitis thessalia in El Palmar National Park?
March, May, July–September and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Limenitis thessalia in El Palmar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, June and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Limenitis thessalia?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Limenitis thessalia sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is El Palmar National Park the best place to see a Limenitis thessalia?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Limenitis thessalia sightings, El Palmar National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Limenitis thessalia live in El Palmar National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Limenitis thessalia that you can see in El Palmar National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Ortilia velica (about 40%), Number Eighty (about 40%) and Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Limenitis thessalia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Limenitis thessalia is recorded against all the insects logged in El Palmar National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.