What are the chances of seeing a Footman Moth in Eravikulam National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Footman Moth sighting in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 9 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Footman Moth in Eravikulam National Park?
July–August and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Footman Moth in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–June, September and November–January, the lowest months. Those are among Eravikulam National Park's wettest months, with about 390 mm of rain a month against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Footman Moth?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Footman Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Eravikulam National Park the best place to see a Footman Moth?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Footman Moth sightings, Eravikulam National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 30%) and Sinharaja Forest Reserve (Sri Lanka, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Footman Moth live in Eravikulam National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Footman Moth that you can see in Eravikulam National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Clouded Tiger Moth (about 20%), Handmaiden Moth (about 20%) and Laelia exclamationis (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Footman Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Footman Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Eravikulam National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.