What are the chances of seeing a Golden-naped Tanager in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-naped Tanager sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 332 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 121st most-seen of the 542 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-naped Tanager in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-naped Tanager in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-naped Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-naped Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Farallones de Cali National Natural Park the best place to see a Golden-naped Tanager?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Golden-naped Tanager sightings, Farallones de Cali National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Golden-naped Tanager live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-naped Tanager that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Flame-rumped Tanager (about 70%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%) and Green Honeycreeper (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-naped Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-naped Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (332 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.