What are the chances of seeing a Glaucocharis interruptus in Fiordland National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Glaucocharis interruptus sighting in Fiordland National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 201 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Glaucocharis interruptus in Fiordland National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Glaucocharis interruptus in Fiordland National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Glaucocharis interruptus?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Glaucocharis interruptus sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Glaucocharis interruptus?
Only Fiordland National Park, in our data
Fiordland National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Glaucocharis interruptus sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Glaucocharis interruptus live in Fiordland National Park?
Same genus: Glaucocharis
The closest relatives of the Glaucocharis interruptus that you can see in Fiordland National Park (genus Glaucocharis) are Glaucocharis leucoxantha (about 10%), Glaucocharis lepidella (about 10%) and Glaucocharis pyrsophanes (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Glaucocharis interruptus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Glaucocharis interruptus is recorded against all the insects logged in Fiordland National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.