What are the chances of seeing a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes in Fiordland National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes sighting in Fiordland National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 201 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes in Fiordland National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes in Fiordland National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Glaucocharis pyrsophanes sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Fiordland National Park the best place to see a Glaucocharis pyrsophanes?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Glaucocharis pyrsophanes sightings, Fiordland National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Rakiura National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Glaucocharis pyrsophanes live in Fiordland National Park?
Same genus: Glaucocharis
The closest relatives of the Glaucocharis pyrsophanes that you can see in Fiordland National Park (genus Glaucocharis) are Glaucocharis interruptus (about 10%), Glaucocharis leucoxantha (about 10%) and Glaucocharis lepidella (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Glaucocharis pyrsophanes sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Glaucocharis pyrsophanes is recorded against all the insects logged in Fiordland National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.