What are the chances of seeing a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Fiordland National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Proteuxoa tetronycha sighting in Fiordland National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 96th most-seen of the 201 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Fiordland National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Fiordland National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Proteuxoa tetronycha sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Fiordland National Park the best place to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Proteuxoa tetronycha sightings, Fiordland National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Rakiura National Park (New Zealand, about 20%) and Arthur's Pass National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Proteuxoa tetronycha live in Fiordland National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Proteuxoa tetronycha that you can see in Fiordland National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are New Zealand Cutworm (about 20%), Common Dotted Wainscot (about 10%) and Ichneutica atristriga (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Proteuxoa tetronycha sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Proteuxoa tetronycha is recorded against all the insects logged in Fiordland National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.