What are the chances of seeing a Mottled Wood Owl in Gir National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Mottled Wood Owl sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 69th most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Mottled Wood Owl in Gir National Park?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Mottled Wood Owl in Gir National Park on a given day, against about 10% in October to March, the lowest months. That is one of Gir National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain against almost none in February. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Mottled Wood Owl?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mottled Wood Owl sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Mottled Wood Owl?
Yes
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Mottled Wood Owl sightings, Gir National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 10%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Mottled Wood Owl live in Gir National Park?
Same family: Strigidae
The closest relatives of the Mottled Wood Owl that you can see in Gir National Park (family Strigidae, Typical Owls) are Indian Scops-Owl (about 30%), Spotted Owlet (about 30%) and Brown Fish-Owl (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Mottled Wood Owl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mottled Wood Owl is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.